TruaceTracing the truth around AIMonday, September 14, 2026
The Index

What the evidence says.What the public feels.

Ranks distinct AI gain and problem claims from the published record. Scores reward impact, independent source strength, scale, confidence, and recency.

1,402 results
Show filters and sorting

AI gains · 778

83
GainHealth· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Multi-Scale Feature Fusion model combining U-Net segmentation, EfficientNet and attention autoencoder features fused via CCA and YOLO classification achieved 99.95% accuracy on apple leaf disease datasets, enabling early detection for sustainable agriculture.

Researchers described a Multi-Scale Feature Fusion system for apple leaf disease identification that segments diseased tissue with U-Net, cleans background with Rank Order Fuzzy filtering, extracts features with EfficientNet and an Attention-based Autoencoder, fuses them with Canonical Correlation Analysis, and classifies with YOLO. Tested on five apple leaf datasets, it reported 99.95% classification accuracy with cross-validation and statistical testing.

Impact 30%69
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%89

Updated Jul 19, 2026 · TRV-2026-0262

83
GainHealth· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

UBNet-Seg, a 2.3M-parameter U-Net variant using lung fields as geometric proxy, achieved 95.85% lung Dice at 0.05s inference and 90.31% automated cardiomegaly accuracy on NIH, rising to 93.63% on NIH and 91.21% on OpenI after expert-guided refinement.

A peer-reviewed study published July 16, 2026 describes UBNet-Seg, a lightweight 2.3-million-parameter U-Net variant that infers cardiomegaly from lung field geometry rather than explicit heart segmentation. Trained on 11,748 images, it was evaluated on external NIH and OpenI chest X-ray datasets, reporting 95.85% lung Dice and 0.05-second inference.

Impact 30%69
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%89

Updated Jul 18, 2026 · TRV-2026-0257

81
GainScience· Rising· Evidence: High (5 sources)

AI-powered voice assistants were found to enhance independence and daily functioning and offer emotional companionship for socially isolated older adults

On 2026-07-09, a systematic review from Aston Publications Explorer synthesized 48 studies on older adults' interactions with AI-powered voice assistants, selected from 109 publications across Scopus, PubMed, and the ACM Digital Library. It identified six key research themes and reported a major finding on the potential for emotional companionship for socially isolated individuals.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%100
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%100
Recency 10%88

Updated Jul 13, 2026 · TRV-2026-0138

AI problems · 624

82
ProblemCrime· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

7.2% of evaluated MCP servers contained general vulnerabilities and 5.5% exhibited MCP-specific tool poisoning, part of eight distinct vulnerabilities largely distinct from traditional software flaws.

In a first large-scale empirical study published May 2026, researchers examined 1,899 open-source Model Context Protocol servers, the standard introduced by Anthropic in late 2024 to unify tool calling for Foundation Models. Using health metrics and a combined general and MCP-specific scanner, they measured adoption signals and code quality across the ecosystem.

Impact 30%63
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%88

Updated Jul 13, 2026 · TRV-2026-0137

79
ProblemHealth· Newly added· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

AI research in pain medicine still faces challenges with research data generalization, multimodal fusion strategies, model interpretability, and ethical compliance.

A September 2026 review in Journal of Translational Medicine surveyed AI research in pain medicine across three areas: objective pain assessment by fusing facial expressions, voice and physiological signals, automated segmentation of spine, nerves and needle tips from medical images, and AI support for classification, treatment decisions and prognosis in conditions from osteoarthritis to cancer pain.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%100

Updated Sep 14, 2026 · TRV-2026-1080

78
ProblemHealth· Newly added· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

In non-small-cell lung cancer, AI tools show strong benchmark performance but have repeatedly failed to translate into patient benefit because most models are retrospective, single-center, and validated only on metrics that do not track survival, toxicity, or procedural burden.

This peer-reviewed review examines why AI tools for non-small-cell lung cancer, despite promises of earlier detection and more precise treatment selection and radiotherapy, have rarely changed bedside care. It introduces the biological-groundingd7translational-readiness matrix to map each model on biological grounding and lifecycle validation and to specify the next study needed for clinical advancement.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%99

Updated Sep 8, 2026 · TRV-2026-1017

78
ProblemLabor· Newly added· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive artificial intelligence frameworks capable of automating the entire meta-analysis workflow, including literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment.

Traditional secondary meta-analysis workflows are highly labour-intensive, time-consuming, and difficult to update in real time. Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive artificial intelligence frameworks capable of automating the entire meta-analysis workflow, including literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%98

Updated Sep 5, 2026 · TRV-2026-0983

Recomputed live from the record · Sep 14, 2026, 7:28 AM