Policy · Regulation & Standards

All Regulation & Standards Elections & Speech Courts & Liability Defense & Security

20 stories · page 1 of 2

Both readings

Gavin Newsom imposes strict new rules on AI, social media and chatbots for children

California has adopted what Gavin Newsom described as “nation-leading” legislation that bans addictive social media features for young users, regulates companion chatbots and implements new safeguards around AI. The laws, signed by the Democratic California governor on Thursday, include AB 1709, which bars social media companies from using infinite scroll and autoplay for users under 16. “This is about actually addressing the problem, the scrolling, the algorithms. This is about addressing the substantive issue…

The Guardian · Policy

Gavin Newsom imposes strict new rules on AI, social media and chatbots for children

Evidence-backed gain

Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning

Introduction: This mixed methods study examines the effects of AI-mediated language instruction on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. It addresses the increasing interest in AI-driven educational technologies and their potential to revolutionize language instruction. Methods: Two intact classes, consisting of a total of 60 university students, participated in this study. The experimental group received AI-mediated instructi…

Policy

Evidence-backed gain

AI-Enabled Real-World Evidence in Oncology: A Statistical Perspective for Regulatory Decisions

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to strengthen real-world evidence (RWE) for regulatory decision-making, but its contribution varies by application and methodological maturity. RWE remains limited by challenges in data quality, population selection, treatment characterization, outcome assessment, and statistical methodology. Machine learning and generative AI (genAI), combined with causal inference frameworks, may address these challenges. We review applications, limitations, including reproducibil…

Policy

Both readings

Regulatory Research Priorities for AI Use in the Medicine Lifecycle: A European Perspective with Global Relevance

Regulatory bodies play a central role in providing guidance that enables safe and effective use of artificial intelligence tools in medicine development and evaluation. Regulators can also act as catalysts for regulatory science research. To inform these efforts, a European-wide survey was conducted to solicit stakeholder perspectives on the priority areas for regulatory science research related to the use of artificial intelligence in the medicine lifecycle. Twenty-eight regulatory science research questions we…

Policy

Both readings

Reframing risk management for AI-enabled medical devices: A dual-layer risk governance framework

BackgroundAI-enabled medical devices introduce dynamic, data-dependent risks that challenge traditional safety-risk management frameworks. While ISO 14971, AAMI CR34971, and the EU Artificial Intelligence Act each address elements of device safety and algorithmic governance, they remain fragmented when applied. This review examines conceptual and operational gaps in current approaches and proposes an integrated governance model for AI-specific safety-risk management.MethodsA structured narrative review was condu…

Policy

Both readings

Regulating Manipulative Design Is Not Preempted by CDA 230 or the First Amendment

For over two decades, there has been a heated debate among legal scholars, activists, judges, and others about the scope of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. A persistent theme in those debates has been hyperbolic claims about the necessity of immunity from state laws for digital tech platforms and fearmongering that anything less than maximum immunity will destroy the Internet. This Article argues that states retain considerable discretion to regulate digital platforms’ design and engineering decis…

Policy

Evidence-backed problem

German media regulator says Google's AI Overviews subject to German media law

Germany's media regulator said on Tuesday that Google's AI Overviews and Perplexity AI are subject to the country's media laws, stepping up scrutiny of AI-generated content after a German court found Google liable ‌for inaccurate information produced by the feature.

Policy

Financial regulation reforms in China – can artificial intelligence be a gamechanger to more sustainable financial regulations

Over the past few years, China has seen a substantial change in financial rules. The country’s recent fundamental redesign of its supervision structure has resulted in a dramatically altered regulatory framework for banks and other financial services organizations operating in China. The National Financial Regulatory Administration (NFRA), China’s new super financial regulator, is revolutionizing regulating the financial sector. Except for the securities industry, all financial sectors are regulated by the centr…

Policy

Financial regulation reforms in China – can artificial intelligence be a gamechanger to more sustainable financial regulations

When Is a Decision Automated? A Taxonomy for a Fundamental Rights Analysis

Abstract This Article addresses the pressing issues surrounding the use of automated systems in public decision-making, specifically focusing on migration, asylum, and mobility. Drawing on empirical data, this Article examines the potential and limitations of the General Data Protection Regulation and the Artificial Intelligence Act in effectively addressing the challenges posed by automated decision-making (ADM). The Article argues that the current legal definitions and categorizations of ADM fail to capture th…

Policy

When Is a Decision Automated? A Taxonomy for a Fundamental Rights Analysis

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Public Sector Decision- Making: Benefits, Challenges, and Policy Implications

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming government decision-making processes. This article presents a systematic literature review of 43 studies (2020-2025) examining AI’s impact on public-sector decision-making, delineating its advantages, disadvantages, policy implications, technical aspects, and ethical concerns. The findings indicate that AI technologies offer significant benefits for government decision-making, including improved efficiency, data-driven insights, and enhanced service deliv…

Policy

Disinformation, AI and regulation in Ecuador’s 2025 presidential election

Introduction This research analyses Ecuadorians’ perceptions of the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in the dissemination of disinformation during the 2025 presidential elections. In light of the growing use of synthetic technologies in political campaigns, it examines the impact of AI on electoral integrity, public trust and the need for regulation. Methodology Mixed explanatory approach, based on two surveys ( n = 201 and n = 64), nine semi-structured interviews with experts after the elections,…

Policy

Disinformation, AI and regulation in Ecuador’s 2025 presidential election

The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information d…

Policy

Justitia ex machina: The impact of an AI system on legal decision-making and discretionary authority

Governments increasingly use algorithms to inform or supplant decision-making. Artificial Intelligence systems in particular are considered objective, consistent and efficient decision-makers, but have also been shown to be fallible. Furthermore, the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in government is fraught with challenges which are only partly understood and rarely studied in practice. In this paper, we draw on science and technology studies and human computer interaction and report on a critical case s…

Policy

Justitia ex machina: The impact of an AI system on legal decision-making and discretionary authority

Regulating AI-powered consumer contracts: risks, remedies, and global legal responses|Regolamentazione dei contratti dei consumatori basati sull’Intelligenza Artificiale: rischi, rimedi e risposte giuridiche globali

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has reshaped consumer contracts by enabling automated drafting, personalization, and enforcement at scale, with limited human intervention. While this increases efficiency, it also introduces risks, including bias, opacity, privacy violations, and power asymmetries. This article offers a comparative legal analysis of regulatory responses and case studies, focusing on the EU AI Act and contrasting it with approaches in the US, Canada, Brazil, and emerging frameworks in Asia-Pacific. T…

Policy

Regulating AI-powered consumer contracts: risks, remedies, and global legal responses|Regolamentazione dei contratti dei consumatori basati sull’Intelligenza Artificiale: rischi, rimedi e risposte giuridiche globali

The EU's AI act: A framework for collaborative governance

In February 2024, the Council and the European Parliament (EP) agreed on the Artificial Intelligence Regulation (usually known as AI Act, AIA) .2 This regulation evaluates AI applications to ensure they are used ethically and responsibly, promoting the development of safe and lawful AI across the EU's single market. It establishes a comprehensive legal framework with a risk-based approach, aiming to achieve a balance between protecting the health, safety, and fundamental rights of European citizens and ensuring…

Policy

The EU's AI act: A framework for collaborative governance