TruaceTracing the truth around AITuesday, September 15, 2026
The Index

What the evidence says.What the public feels.

Ranks distinct AI gain and problem claims from the published record. Scores reward impact, independent source strength, scale, confidence, and recency.

1,418 results
Show filters and sorting

AI gains · 787

78
GainEducation· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

ChatGPT can support teaching and learning by enabling personalized interactive instruction and creating formative assessment prompts that give ongoing feedback.

Published December 7, 2023, this exploratory synthesis examines ChatGPT after its November 30, 2022 public release and rapid adoption, reviewing recent literature on how the tool is being used in education. It identifies potential benefits for personalized and interactive learning and for formative assessment, while also noting drawbacks.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%95

Updated Aug 19, 2026 · TRV-2026-0835

78
GainHealth· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Meta-analysis of 19 studies with 100,790 participants found AI/ML models achieved pooled discrimination of 0.836 for predicting tuberculosis treatment failure.

By August 2026, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 studies evaluated AI and machine learning models to predict tuberculosis treatment failure. Nineteen studies with 100,790 participants were pooled, yielding an AUC of 0.836 with high heterogeneity, with tree-based and multimodal approaches common and most publications appearing after 2019.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%95

Updated Aug 18, 2026 · TRV-2026-0817

78
GainHealth· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Integration of multi-omics and machine learning can improve cardiovascular disease management by supporting definitive and early diagnosis, severity assessment, full-course risk stratification, and individualized prediction of drug and surgical benefit-risk to inform decisions.

Published August 13, 2026 as a peer-reviewed review in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, the article synthesizes recent advances using machine learning together with multi-omics to address cardiovascular disease heterogeneity where conventional one-size-fits-all strategies often yield limited benefit.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%94

Updated Aug 16, 2026 · TRV-2026-0784

78
GainPolicy· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Regulatory guidance enables safe and effective use of AI tools in medicine development and evaluation across the medicine lifecycle.

On 2026-08-13, a peer-reviewed article reported a European-wide survey to set regulatory science research priorities for AI use in the medicine lifecycle. Authors developed 28 research questions across seven domains and collected 273 responses from regulators, industry, patients and consumers, academics, and healthcare professionals, finding convergence in rankings across groups.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%94

Updated Aug 15, 2026 · TRV-2026-0772

AI problems · 631

77
ProblemHealth· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Only 59% of patients felt meaningfully involved in decisions about their own care, and clinicians reported implementation barriers including poor connectivity, time pressures and training burden.

Between January 2024 and January 2026, a health district in Australia implemented a digital wound model of care combining an AI-enabled app with a virtual command centre across four hospitals and five community health centres. A post-implementation evaluation surveyed and interviewed 94 patients, 75 frontline clinicians, 9 senior wound nurses and a product manager, reviewing governance minutes to assess acceptability and perceived benefit.

Impact 30%63
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%60
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%97

Updated Sep 1, 2026 · TRV-2026-0949

77
ProblemHealth· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Most classical AI models for bipolar disorder treatment optimization had high risk of bias and lack of external validation, and remain exploratory rather than ready for clinical use.

A PRISMA-guided systematic review of 35 studies examined classical AI for treatment optimization in adult bipolar disorder across five outcomes: acute response, long-term maintenance, relapse/readmission, safety/dose, and brain aging/phenotyping. By the July 2026 publication date, pooled performance ranged from modest for acute response (AUC 0.68) to moderate-to-high for maintenance (AUC 0.80) and high accuracy for safety/dose (85%-97%).

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%89

Updated Jul 22, 2026 · TRV-2026-0511

77
ProblemHealth· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Deployment of AI in healthcare is limited by risks of data privacy breaches, algorithmic bias, lack of model interpretability, and gaps in regulatory oversight and human clinical oversight.

Published September 23 2025 as a peer-reviewed review, the article surveys how AI is being applied across healthcare, from analyzing electronic health records and medical imaging to supporting drug discovery, predictive analytics, telemedicine and wearable biosensors, with emphasis on low-resource and remote settings.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%89

Updated Jul 22, 2026 · TRV-2026-0484

77
ProblemCrime· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Same machine learning fraud detection systems encounter persistent challenges including data imbalance, concept drift and privacy concerns that complicate implementation in operational financial environments.

On 2025-11-05, Applied Sciences published a comprehensive review of machine learning for financial fraud detection. The authors surveyed supervised, unsupervised and hybrid approaches across credit card, financial statement, insurance and money laundering fraud, reviewed datasets and metrics, and included two case studies applying supervised models to real-world banking data.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%85
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%89

Updated Jul 22, 2026 · TRV-2026-0477

Recomputed live from the record · Sep 15, 2026, 9:56 AM