TruaceTracing the truth around AITuesday, September 15, 2026
The Index

What the evidence says.What the public feels.

Ranks distinct AI gain and problem claims from the published record. Scores reward impact, independent source strength, scale, confidence, and recency.

1,419 results
Show filters and sorting

AI gains · 788

69
GainHealth· Newly added· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

In NSCLC immunotherapy selection, CB-only AI models outperformed PD-L1 and clinical scores in the independent test set, and both expert and nonexpert physicians improved their predictions when using the explainable AI decision support tool.

The I3LUNG study enrolled 2,396 patients with non-small cell lung cancer to develop AI models for immunotherapy selection, integrating clinical and blood data, CT, digital pathology and genomics into early and intermediate fusion models. CB-only models reached AUC up to 0.77 in the independent TEST set and outperformed PD-L1, ECOG PS, NLR, LDH and LIPI, and a usability study found physicians improved predictions with the explainable AI tool.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%35
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%100

Updated Sep 15, 2026 · TRV-2026-1095

69
GainHealth· Newly added· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

A 3D-ResNet18 multi-task model reduced error in estimating rib fracture age from chest CT to 7.94 days MAE, outperforming manual expert evaluation at 10.65 days, while also classifying healing stage and fracture type.

By September 2026, researchers reported a multi-task deep learning model based on 3D-ResNet18 designed to assist expert judgment of rib fracture age from chest CT. Trained on 1,848 fractures from multiple centers, the model was tested externally and reported to predict fracture age, healing stage, and fracture type concurrently.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%35
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%100

Updated Sep 15, 2026 · TRV-2026-1094

69
GainHealth· Newly added· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

AI systems including large language models can process unstructured clinical text and interpret complex laboratory findings to support clinical decision-making in laboratory medicine.

This narrative review from Chinese Medical Journal examines how AI in laboratory medicine has evolved from conventional machine learning on structured results to deep learning and large language models that handle unstructured clinical text. It compares four paradigms and reviews evidence across blood cell morphology, autoverification, infectious risk stratification, urinalysis interpretation, decision support, and report generation.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%35
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%100

Updated Sep 15, 2026 · TRV-2026-1093

69
GainHealth· Newly added· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Large language models have the potential to democratize medical knowledge and facilitate access to healthcare in clinical practice.

A Communications Medicine overview published October 10 2023 examines large language models as text-processing AI tools that gained wide attention after ChatGPT's November 2022 release, assessing their near-human ability to answer, summarize and translate and their emerging use in clinical practice, medical research and medical education.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%35
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%100

Updated Sep 14, 2026 · TRV-2026-1089

AI problems · 631

68
ProblemClimate· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Rapid growth of deep learning workloads increases energy consumption and carbon emissions, while current carbon tracking and static scheduling fail to deliver carbon awareness in real ML operations.

On 2026-08-16, a peer-reviewed paper in Discover Artificial Intelligence described rising energy use and emissions from growing deep learning workloads in contemporary data centres and presented EcoSchedAI, a carbon-aware job scheduling framework intended to bring carbon awareness into actual machine learning operational processes.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%35
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%94

Updated Aug 17, 2026 · TRV-2026-0812

68
ProblemHealth· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

Artificial intelligence approaches for CT-based prediction of hematoma expansion and adverse outcomes after spontaneous ICH are limited by small cohorts, overfitting, dataset heterogeneity, insufficient external validation, poor interpretability and lack of workflow integration.

This peer-reviewed review in GeroScience appraises CT-based prediction of hematoma expansion after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, a major determinant of early deterioration. It compares contrast-enhanced signs like spot, leakage and iodine signs with non-contrast signs including blend, black hole, island, satellite, hypodensity and swirl signs, plus shape and heterogeneity, and evaluates composite scores and AI approaches including radiomics, machine learning and deep learning.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%35
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%94

Updated Aug 17, 2026 · TRV-2026-0810

68
ProblemHealth· Stable· Evidence: Moderate (1 source)

AI adoption in nursing risks replacing relationship-based person-centred fundamental care with algorithm-based care and causing professional infantilisation and loss of critical thinking.

On 2026-08-15 a discursive paper in Journal of Advanced Nursing explored post-humanism and AI in nursing and healthcare through critical reflection on contemporary and established literature. It concluded AI presents both potential benefit and severe threat to fundamental nursing care defined by patient/nurse relationships and patient-centredness carried out with critical reasoning.

Impact 30%49
Evidence 25%95
Scale 20%35
Confidence 15%87
Recency 10%94

Updated Aug 17, 2026 · TRV-2026-0809

Recomputed live from the record · Sep 16, 2026, 3:45 AM